Business Law Appropriately Business Activities

Question: Describe about the Business Law for Appropriately Business Activities. Answer: 1. The case study depicts that Bill and Jill were interested to buy Sydney cbd Caf and Fine food caf. With considering contract regarding the case, the seller Dodgy Pty. Ltd dishonestly stated that the weekly takings would be $10,000 which is charged up to five years. The contract also states that the costs of the business seem to be estimated at $ 3000 per week. With the consideration of the contract, it seems to be stating that the seller does not consists of the authority to run the business for five years that is starting from July 1 (Homburg, 2008). After continuing the business for some days, Bill and Jill observed that averages of weekly takings are created which seems to be less than the cost mentioned in the contract. The business areas are focused with considering dishonesty in business which seems to be carried out and thereby the contract seems to be dishonestly created for Bill and Jill. With the consideration of the business laws in Australia, breaching of the contract with focusing on the case of forgery is focused. The act undertaken clearly determines the Act of Forgery as per the Laws depicted in the Acts of Australia (Elliott and Quinn, 2007). Since the contract is undertaken on the grounds of Forgery, the contract is legally not valuable and thereby the cancellation of the contract can take place with receiving the authorization for the business continued by Bill and Jill. The determination of the remedies with focusing on the breaching of the contract in the case of business law determines that the Bill and Jill can claim for the damages that have been made to them and thereby the authorization of holding the business can be achieved on the grounds of forgery. In addition to this, the common law remedies are seemed to be undertaken with the consideration of values regarding the performance and the injunctions for the contractual breaching (Andrews, 2011). 2. The business law of Australia provides current and clear commentary on the application and theory of all the aspects of the business law. It states that the companies should conduct their business activities appropriately and ethically. It includes rules and regulation that should be followed by business organizations while operating their businesses. In the given case study, Homeslice Pizza was run by Hugh and Uber Eats was used by them to pick up and deliver pizzas all around Sydney. The selling of pizza was very good, and food delivery service helped their business (Australian corporations legislation, 2010). In order to decrease their expenses, he decided to stop use UberEats and arranged car for delivery. Apart from this, to decrease the cost further, they decided to use out dated cheese in pizzas. The advertisement also released by the company that they use fresh ingredients with cheeses from the farm. The customers who purchased pizzas get sick due to the out of date ingred ients used in the pizza. One of the customers dies because of the ingredients (Davenport and Parker, 2011). Therefore, as per the business law, the sale of pizza with outdated ingredients and cheese is an illegal act that leads to the death of a customer. Therefore, as per the law, the government officials will take legal action against the sale of the pizza. Hugh has to pay a huge penalty for this act or even close down its business. The consumer law of Australia clearly states the protection of the consumers that are undertaken with considering the unfair trade practices and the unfair investment trades (Gleeson, Watson, and Peden, 2013). The involvement of the protection against the unfair business considered with thereby protecting the customers from the frauds. The consideration of the case depicts that Hugh and his brother is using outdated ingredients in the business of food undertaken (Solomon, 2009). It depicts that due to this people felt ill and among them, one died due t o the food poisoning. In this case, Hugh was found to be guilt with the consideration of the Australian Consumer Law and thereby the actions are depicted against Hugh and its brother. Hence the Australian consumer law acts as a protection shield for the consumers, and the guilt seems to be disobeying the rules and the regulations of the Protection Act of Food laws of Australia. It thereby provides the appropriate justification with focusing on the variation of the case provided by the law (Thomas, 2010). The rule of the Trade Protection Act seems to be disobeyed with consideration of the views of contract. The state government legislation and Australian government exist to protect the customers, community, and environment as well as promoting fair trading and competition. Business law, environment law, and consumer law govern how companies should interact with the customers, suppliers, and other businesses. Therefore, as per the law, the sale of pizza is an illegal act, and legal action should be taken by government officials. Hug has to pay a penalty to the family of the death persona and also close down his business. Australia has a statutory framework that ensures fair trading for consumers and businesses (Malbon and Nottage, 2013). The framework is enforced and administered by Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Therefore, Australian government legislation, territory, and state laws ensure consumer protection. In the given case study, the customers should be provided with remedies, and they can take legal action against the company for the sale of out of cheese and ingr edients. The government also has a statutory framework to regulate information standards and product safety. The standards are designed to make sure that harmful goods are not marketed in the country. The Australian competition and consumer commission enforced the standards. In the given case study, the Hugh was selling harmful products to the customers that made them sick and death of one of the customers (Shaw, 2003). It was an unfair trade practice that was conducted by Hugh, and the customers have legal rights to take action against him. Hugh has to pay the penalty for this act as he was responsible and have to close the pizza business. Territory and state government offices of fair trading are involved in the enforcement of the product safety rule. The primary role of territory and state offices is to assist the consumers. Hugh was selling the pizza with outdated ingredients and cheese that affected the health of the customers as well as the death of a customer (Watson, Gleeson and Higgins, 2013). Therefore, legal actions need to be taken by the customers and government officials against this illegal act. The business has to pay a penalty to the customers as well as the court may order to close the business. The competition law, consumer law, business law and product liability regulation explains that the act was illegal, and remedies are available for the customers. Hugh has to pay penalty if the court states that it is an illegal act that affected the health of the customers. It is important for the business organizations to understand the regulation in order to ensure fair competition and protection of the consu mers as well as integrity in the market. References Andrews, N. (2011).Contract law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elliott, C. and Quinn, F. (2007).Contract law. Harlow: Pearson Longman. Homburg, J. (2008).Cornerstone law series. [Adelaide]: Law Society of South Australia. Solomon, R. (2009).Cornerstone law series. [Adelaide]: Law Society of South Australia. Thomas, G. (2010).Cornerstone law series. [Adelaide]: Law Society of South Australia. Australian corporations legislation. (2010). Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Davenport, S. and Parker, D. (2011).Business and law in Australia. Pyrmont, N.S.W.: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia. Gleeson, J., Watson, J. and Peden, E. (2013).Historical Foundations of Australian Law, Volume 2. Leichhardt: Federation Press. Malbon, J. and Nottage, L. (2013).Consumer law policy in Australia New Zealand. Annandale, N.S.W.: Federation Press. Shaw, M. (2003).International law. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Watson, J., Gleeson, J. and Higgins, R. (2013).Historical foundations of Australian law. Annandale, N.S.W.: Federation Press.